Nidhogg |
I'm trying to strike a balance between the three.
Nidhogg is relatively slapstick but it's serious regarding the combat. The good thing about the game is how every playerstate is beneficial in some ways, yet bad in others. For example, holding the sword high protects the player from jumping attacks. In the middle gives the freedom to move more quickly to the other states, and at the bottom protects against rolling attacks. Jumping limits the players movement and attack options whilst in the air but opens up aerial attacks/ maneuvers.
The player needs to use all these abilities, accounting for the different terrain and the position/ state of their opponent. This is the level of depth I want in my game. The downside to this is that it's easy to scare off new players so a level of 'pick up and play' simplicity is requires. By trying to make the game humorous, ridiculous I can hold new players attention spans longer too with the hope that they stay interested long enough for the depth to shine through.
DuckGame |
Towerfall |
I think I'm going to have to test different game styles for SpaceNinja because it's still ambiguous whether or not I should include pickups or not. Pickups add an element of randomness to the game which lowers the mechanical depth to the game but improves the marketability and 'new player experience'...
No comments:
Post a Comment